<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Essential Nutrition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://essential-nutrition-plus.com/health/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://essential-nutrition-plus.com/health</link>
	<description>Your Guide To Better Health and Wellness</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Sugar Bad? by Bud</title>
		<link>http://essential-nutrition-plus.com/health/is-sugar-bad/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Bud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 04:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://essential-nutrition-plus.com/health/?p=86#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Nice article.
You didn't mention Splenda/Sucralose here. How's it rate with the alteratives? Many sources say it's the "best" since it's a "natural" derivative of sugar (mirrored molecule?), but your body does not react to it like sugar.
Also, sweet-n-low was my diabetic grandfather's preference decades ago (my mom still keeps a few packets around), but I recall there being concern about it causing cancer and being derived from coal. Have those concerns changed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article.<br />
You didn&#8217;t mention Splenda/Sucralose here. How&#8217;s it rate with the alteratives? Many sources say it&#8217;s the &#8220;best&#8221; since it&#8217;s a &#8220;natural&#8221; derivative of sugar (mirrored molecule?), but your body does not react to it like sugar.<br />
Also, sweet-n-low was my diabetic grandfather&#8217;s preference decades ago (my mom still keeps a few packets around), but I recall there being concern about it causing cancer and being derived from coal. Have those concerns changed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
